Problems with radiometric and carbon 14 dating

Thus, no one even considers using carbon dating for dates in this range.In theory, it might be useful to archaeology, but not to geology or paleontology.

problems with radiometric and carbon 14 dating-31

C) dating usually want to know about the radiometric[1] dating methods that are claimed to give millions and billions of years—carbon dating can only give thousands of years.

People wonder how millions of years could be squeezed into the biblical account of history. Christians, by definition, take the statements of Jesus Christ seriously.

It cannot be used to date volcanic rocks, for example.

The rate of decay of N in 5,730 years (plus or minus 40 years).

Since it would only take less than 50,000 years to reach equilibrium from a world with no C-14 at the start, this always seemed like a good assumption.

That is until careful measurements revealed a significant disequalibrium. All the present C-14 would accumulate, at present rates of production and build up, in less than 30,000 years!

A "Back to Genesis" way of thinking insists that the Flood of Noah's day would have removed a great deal of the world's carbon from the atmosphere and oceans, particularly as limestone (calcium ate) was precipitated.

Once the Flood processes ceased, C-14 began a slow build-up to equilibrium with C-12—a build-up not yet complete.

It is only useful for once-living things which still contain carbon, like flesh or bone or wood.

Tags: , ,